![]() Acumen 6 The Mount Higher Furzeham Brixham TQ5 8QY UK ISSN 0964-0304 £4.50 [$10 USA] Subscription: 3 issues £12.50 (UK) [£16 Europe or USA sterling; $45 surface $50 airmail USA] email Acumen visit Acumen's website read reviews of earlier issues ![]() Before commenting on this review please read the FAQ page Home page Notes for publishers Want to be a reviewer? Anthologies. Books. Audio. Magazines. Software. Video. Artefacts. Web design by Gerald England This page last updated: 9th August 2005. |
Acumen #52 | |
|
This issues's editorial lays out a challenge for readers to submit their own requirements for a book of poetry having taken to task a reviewer for commenting the poems meet most of today's requirements for popularity. Observant, intelligent, piquant as to subject matter, assured as to tone, it can be read at a sitting, and above all is performable.Acumen finds no argument with observant, intelligent and lets piquant through, suggests that if a poet isn't assured about their work no one else will be either, but stumbles over read at a sitting and performable. I suspect the reviewer was damning with faint praise but as neither reviewer or publisher of the review is identified, then it feels like an excuse to hang an editorial on rather than reasoned argument. Coincidentally there's an outburst of poems on writing poetry, David Sutton's THE HOUSE: ...But I chose instead The house of poetry Under its rowan tree, Half ruin and half grave With green grass like a wave, Nettles and moss for bed, And its people coming and going Like seeds the wind might bring, Like words in the wind's song, Their tenancy not long.where I'm wondering why bother mentioning green to qualify grass and suspect the middle line of the last stanza is padding to bring each stanza up to five lines because it's not doing much else to justify its inclusion. Beryl Cross's TO A POET IN BUD: Do not compose merely as modes dictate. Write from your heart and soul and mind. Let joy and sorrow in. Harvest emotion. State that you will look at each poetic ploy you choose to magnify your words with care. Work at your craft. Read widely. Feel the flow of lines, of rhythms and of rhymes. Despair not if a concept stays in embryo. But do not have conceit enough to think that every piece you write is written well. Yet do not be self-deprecating. Drink deep of inspiration, thoughts gently gel. And if you write a poem that truly flowers make that the standard for the succeeding hours.is no advert for contemporary poetry either. At least Robert Greacen's WRITING A POEM doesn't feel the need for clunking end-rhymes: Writing a poem is dead easy, Not a bit like real work. Pick any old theme Love jealousy, childhood, Choose words at random, Burgle an Oxford dictionary. You needn't bother with rhyme Or rhythm or scansion, That's all old hogwash. Add slang, sex it up, Grammar and spelling are out. Who's afraid of T S Eliot? Take my advice, start now! Soon you'll be sprinting To Faber or Cape, Winning prizes, bursaries, An Arts Council hero, Hammer of the Philistines. Even you can do it. Writing poetry is dead easy.yet manages to sound just as nostalgic as the previous two. It takes Stephen Capus's translation of Anna Akhmatova's CRAFT SECRETS to really get to the point: ...If only you knew what rubbish a poem Can start from for poems aren't fussy whence They spring: the yellow of dandelions growing With goosefoot and burdock by a wooden fence; The scent of tar, mysterious cries in The night, a patch of mould on a wall... And already, slowly the poem is arising, Tender, impassioned, a joy for us all.Amongst the articles, William Oxley gets on his soapbox about the FAUNICATION OF POETRY a title based on Mallarmé's L'APRES-MIDI D'UN FAUNE and a free translation of the poem follows the article arguing that the word poetry has become so stretched as to be in danger of becoming meaningless. He picks up two strands in contemporary poetry, one that still adheres to the traditional idea of poetry and a newer stream focused on language that Oxley suggests should be called poetext rather than poetry. The translation's fun, but given the many cliques already strangling poetry, I don't think creating another split is helpful: more a case of curing a symptom rather than the cause. Phil Simmons expands on his poetic influences from first impressions (Dylan Thomas, Eliot, Kerouac, Shakespeare, Donne), established (Logue, Hughes, Mahon, Pound, Wallace Stevens, Baudelaire) and contemporary (Cumming, Ken Smith, MacSweeney and Gordon Wardman) and argues that we should give clearer emphasis to those authors who try to give us a more engaged, less selfconsciously clever manifestation of how things are.Not an argument I would disagree with but I can't help but notice the over-influence of the white male or that only four listed influences are still living. The reviews are more robust and don't use damning with faint praise as a means of criticism. Back to the poetry and ACUMEN provides a mixture of the sentimental, eg Roy Cameron's A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A DREAM: A dream that comes by night is one we call mare a horse that gallops us through a far and fallow field, with nostrils all aflare and hooves that pound in our head, on a ride that never seems to end until it throws us down into a muddy river bed and finally our eyes are opened. But a dream that comes by day can tiptoe in as warm as sunlight on the face, creep up from behind and tickle where you least expect it, untie those knots of worry with fingers of light and hope and hypnotise like a feather floating on a duckpond...and geniune, eg Joel Lane's THE DENIALS: The sound is building, a long way away, at the edge of things. A slow falling, a breaking, a ruin of air. You can feel its tired momentum behind the traffic. Somewhere inside you know what it means. For so many. You can't imagine, but you know. And the radio's voice, the church bells, the scratch of breath in your chest are all just dialects of silence.Overall: poetry's erratic, prose better, reviews best. | ||
| reviewer: Emma Lee. |